Re: Infant flat skulls can be avoided: U.S. doctors

"Elizabeth Reid" <eliz_reid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:c3338aa8.0307090414.1aaccbed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Jeff Utz" <kidsdoc2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<beg6b1$9mk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> > "Elizabeth Reid" <eliz_reid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:c3338aa8.0307080637.746283fe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > Millions spent on
> > > hat redesign, plunging us into an economic crisis?
> >
> > Hat redesign? If hats were flexible enough to fit around a kid's ears
if
he
> > pulls it a little to far, I am sure they will conform to the shape of
the
> > skull well enough.
> >
> > But it does sound like a good niche market.
>
> Uh, Jeff?  These were deliberately silly examples intended to
> illustrate my belief that head-flattening is not a major crisis.
> I understand that hat redesign will not be necessary.  You may
> want to turn your sarcasm meter up a notch or two.

Perhaps, you had better turn yours up too. I mean, a niche market for flat
head hats? I have heard of flat head engines (the Ford models A, B, C, N,
R,
T and other old cars had them going into the 40s; lawn mowers still have
them, but that is a different story), but flat-head hats for babies?

All the best,

Jeff

> Beth