Sorry I don't know what you in the US consider trashy mags and what you
consider women's mags, but yes depending on where you read a story,
depends
on how much you can believe it be truth. The magazine I read had an
actual
interview with Anjolina so I believe that more than a story with comments
by
a "friend"
Oh yeah Jennifer Anniston seems permanently pregnant wish they would get a
clue :)
--
Pip, in NZ
My girls :
DD1 Jasmine - 5 weeks early - March 02 - 4lb 12oz
6 now and such a treasure.
DD2 Abby - 8 weeks early - Feb 05 - 3lb 14oz
Three now and so grown up :)
"Yes you can drive me insane just by talking to me!"
"Jamie Clark" <jamielee6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Q8qdncJjKLkRYxTVnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Me Myself and I" <guardclan-newsgroups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> news:g6bqsl$7pl$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> It just doesn't seem her style. Considering before they adopted she
said
>> she never wanted to have biological children because there were more
>> needy children in the world. It's because of Brad that she had ****lo,
>> but I just can't believe that they had IVF, it just doesn't ring right
>> with me.
>>
>> BTW I read women's mags all the time and they never seem to retract
>> anything they say even when they are wrong wrong wrong. Look how many
>> times they claim a women is pregnant because she has a little pooch.
>> Hell if I were famous they would say I was due next month LOL.
>
>
> See, I wouldn't call those "women's mags" although I'm sure they are all
> mostly read by women. We're talking about Star, US, OK, National
> Enquirer, etc., right? I consider those "trash" magazines, because like
> you said, they publish whatever they want, true or not, and even random
> speculation, because it sells. To me, "women's mags" are Cosmopolitan,
> Glamour, Vogue, etc. Even People, to me, goes in the latter category
> rather than the former, because I feel like they have a mode*** of
> integrity, and work to check facts and not publish until things are
> verified.
>
> I do think it's funny that they can publish that Jennifer Anniston is
> pregnant for months and months and months and months, when she clearly
> isn't, and then one day, she actually may be, and they will have still
> been saying that she is the whole time, so they'll finally get to say,
> "See? We told you so! We had it here, first!"
> --
>
> Jamie Clark
>
> www.ClarkDigitalArts.com
>
>
|
